Several weeks ago, I read
a chapter from my current work in progress to my writers’ group, and it sparked
a discussion on point of view. Here is a sample from the manuscript.
Fannie Stewart
stabbed her fried chicken with a fork. “Why does Julia have to come here? Why
can’t she stay with friends in St. Louis?”
[The conversation
continues for several paragraphs, and her mother reminds Fannie that it is only
for six months.]
Even one month
with snobbish cousin Julia was too long. Julia, who thought she was so grown
up. Julia, who looked down on Fannie.
Six months would
be unendurable.
This chapter is written
from Fannie’s third person point of view. We know it is third person because
the chapter identifies Fannie by name and uses third person pronouns—“her” in
the example, but also “she” and “hers.” A first person point of view would use “I,”
“me,” “my,” and “mine.”
But if you look at the
last two paragraphs in the example, those are Fannie’s thoughts, not that of a
neutral narrator. So shouldn’t I use first person or at least italicize Fannie’s
thoughts?
No.
Both first person and
third person have the same major constraint—the reader can only know what the
POV character knows. But it is easier to get around the disadvantages of that
approach when using third person.
In first person, you are
stuck in the character’s head. But third person is like a camera that can zoom
in and out. It can zoom in on the person’s thoughts in a way that tells the
reader that it’s a close-up shot. No italics required.
Or if you want to keep a
secret, you zoom out. The reader still only sees what the character sees but
doesn’t hear the chatter in the character’s head.
Large jumps are
disconcerting, but small ones are barely noticeable. In the example above, the
first paragraph is middle-distance or less. We are sitting at the dining room
table with her, but we judge her feelings by her actions and her words rather
than reading her thoughts. But just a few paragraphs later, we do. That lens
adjustment is restrained enough that the change works. Or at least I think it
does.
After our discussion, I
did experiment with rewriting my manuscript in first person, but it sounded
unnatural. Besides, I wanted my characters to have a few secrets from the
readers until later in the story. If you are inside someone’s head, readers
expect you to be honest with them and tell them what the character is thinking
all the time. There are a few tricks a writer can use, but they wouldn’t work in
my story.
I’m glad I tried first
person, though, because now it’s not the right approach for this book.
But maybe my next one
will be in first person.
No comments:
Post a Comment