This
week’s blog post was originally published on August 6, 2018, when I was
researching as as yet unpublished novel about the Siege of Vickburg during the
Civil War.
Detecting
History
Only detectives
should write historical novels. I don’t mean the kind of detective with a
magnifying glass or a knowledge of fingerprints. But writing historical novels
requires a significant amount of research and deductive reasoning to get the
history right.
In June, I dragged
Roland along on a research trip. I am writing a book that takes place during
the Civil War Siege of Vicksburg, Mississippi, and I wanted to do some research
at the library in the Old Court House (pictured above) and visit the battlefield.
While there, I gathered information on a real girl named Lucy McRae. She never
comes onstage in my book and is only mentioned briefly, but she was trapped in
a literal cave-in and I want my protagonist to hear about that incident. Also,
Lucy comes from the same income class as my protagonist, so they would probably
live in the same part of town and attend the same school. Knowing more about
Lucy helps me make my own character more authentic.
My earlier
research indicated that Lucy was 10 or 11 years old, but the movie at the
battleground said she was 13. When writing for a middle grade audience, that is
a big difference, and I needed to determine whether she was younger or older or
the same age as my twelve-year-old protagonist. This is where the detective
works comes in.
The research
library had copies of the 1861 city directory and the 1850 census but none of
the 1860 census. The 1861 city directory and the 1850 census showed a William
McRae who was a merchant. At the time, he had four sons and no daughters. Was
he Lucy’s father? He could be if she was 10 or 11 in 1863 since she would not
have been born when the 1850 census was taken. And it was also possible that
she could have been 13 if the census was taken early in the year and she was
born right afterwards. But the 1850 census listed the youngest boy as less than
a year old, making it less likely that Lucy would have been born shortly after.
And was this even
the right William McRae? Several sources identified Lucy’s father as the
sheriff, and both the city directory and the 1850 census listed this William
McRae as a merchant. So did he become the sheriff by 1863?
After returning
home, I went online and found a copy of the 1860 census. It showed a William
McRae who was listed as sheriff and named the same wife and sons as in the 1850
census. The 1960 census also showed a daughter, Lucy, and gave her age as
eight, which is consistent with her being ten or eleven at the time of the
siege. Mystery solved.
But it took some
detective work.
No comments:
Post a Comment