I just re-read the first three books in the Cherry Ames series by Helen Wells. For those of you who don’t know, Cherry Ames was part of the craze for series about older teenage girls that started with Nancy Drew. Cherry was a nursing student and then a nurse rather than an amateur detective like Nancy, so most of the series takes place when she was a young adult. Although Cherry did solve some mysteries, they were secondary to her life as a nurse.
When I was a girl, my family occasionally
stayed with my Uncle Lester and his family. My cousin Ann was four years older
than I was and away in college during my high school years, so I slept in her
room several times. One of the things I liked about it was Ann’s collection of Cherry
Ames books, which I got to read while I was there.
Ann went to medical school and became
a doctor, so many years later I asked her why she read books about a nurse
instead of a doctor. If I’m remembering it correctly, Ann said she wanted
stories with a medical setting and the Cherry Ames books were the best she could
get.
By the time Ann started medical
school, it was already the late 1960s and female doctors weren’t as unusual as
they had been. Fiction hadn’t caught up with the times, however.
This isn’t a criticism of the Cherry
Ames books. Nursing is a noble profession, and society needs nurses as well as
doctors. Those first books in the series were consistent with the state of the
medical profession when they were written and published in the 1940s. Although
there are no female doctors or male nurses in them, there is also no suggestion
that those roles are inappropriate and, for all I know, female doctors and male
nurses may have appeared later in the series. Furthermore, I believe those
books were written the way they should have been. Even though they were not
historical fiction when they were written, they were set during World War II
and have become historicals simply by occurring in an easily identifiable historical
setting.
I strongly believe that historical
fiction should reflect the time it is set in. Many of my novels include beliefs
and actions that are not popular today. For example, Learning to Surrender has
a protagonist who believes in slavery during much of the book until
circumstances show her the evils that exist even for slaves with “good”
masters.
This doesn’t mean that historicals
can’t give a nod to today’s thinking, but it must flow with the story. A good
example is Tenmile by Sandra Dallas, which takes place in 1880. The
protagonist often helps her doctor father, and people tell her that she would
be a good nurse. Nobody except the housekeeper encourages her to become a
doctor, although the protagonist’s father seems to be wavering in his opinion when
the story ends. The protagonist is still too young to become either a doctor or
a nurse, but the reader has learned there is a medical school that takes women,
and we are confident that will be the protagonist’s future. The prevailing
opinion among the people in the story is consistent with the times, however.
Don’t get me wrong. I have no problem
with books that intentionally change history and admit it, and temporarily misleading
information is often crucial to a plot during the course of a novel. But if you
want readers to come away believing your historical setting is correct, you
should make sure it is.
Always respect the reader.
No comments:
Post a Comment