I’ve
been reading a lot of memoirs lately, and they highlighted something I already
knew: reading tastes differ. This is a statement I’ve made before, but my point
then was that a writer shouldn’t be discouraged simply because someone doesn’t
like that person’s work. This time I have a different point: don’t feel that
something is wrong with you simply because you don’t enjoy a book that your
friends or the newspaper critics rave about.
I’m
going to illustrate this with my recent experience. Although my reading covered
a broader selection, I will limit this discussion to three memoirs written by
white women, including two from my own generation. All of these books received
both popular and critical acclaim, but I enjoyed one, struggled with another, and
couldn’t make it through the third. (They are discussed below in the opposite
order.)
CAVEAT:
All of these books are well-written. Don’t treat my analyses as traditional
reviews or assume that you will share my opinion. If you do, you have missed my
point.
I’ll
begin with The Liars’ Club by Mary Karr. It started out well enough with
the aftermath of a seemingly dramatic incident and a few hints about the
incident itself, but then the author says, “Because it took so long for me to
paste together what happened, I will leave that part of the story missing for a
while.” Unfortunately, I never got there. Karr may have thought it was a
carrot, but she dangled it so far from my eyes that it wasn’t any motivation at
all. I don’t understand why she did that, either. Memoirs don’t have to be
chronological, and Karr plays with time elsewhere in the book, so why not here?
After
the opening, I found The Liars’ Club boring and dull. Yes, I know those
are synonyms, but it deserves to be said twice. I heard or read at some point
that a reader should give a book fifty pages before giving up, but I quit at
page 46. The story was riddled with profanity, but my main problem was boredom.
I simply couldn’t get interested. And yet, according to the back cover, The
Liars’ Club was “selected as one of the best books of 1995 by People,
Time, The New Yorker, and Entertainment Weekly.”
An
American Childhood by Annie Dillard also started with an intriguing
story and then stalled. In many ways, her childhood is the most like mine. Yes,
there were some obvious differences: Dillard was a city girl and I a small town
one, she was fearless and popular and I was timid and tolerated, and her
parents had a substantial income while mine learned to wring the most from
their more limited funds. But we both grew up in the same era to loving parents
who gave us plenty of freedom, and we both had a privileged childhood, although
I didn’t realize how privileged mine was until much later. Even so, the book
stalled because of the passages where she describes her growing consciousness
of self and the world around her. Unfortunately, I can’t find the right words
to describe them. Metaphysical? No. Philosophical? Closer, but still not right.
Even abstract doesn’t work because Dillard is masterful at using concrete
images to describe her abstract thoughts and perceptions. Whatever you call
them, I found those passages tedious because they didn’t match my own thought
processes or emotional experiences.
Still,
there were two differences between An American Childhood and The Liars’
Club that made me give Dillard’s book a chance. First, she completed her opening
story right away rather than leaving me feeling unsatisfied. Second, sprinkled
among those problematic passages were events that I understood, such as her
fear of the glowing monster that traveled around her bedroom walls at night—a
fear that continued but could be controlled after she discovered the monster came
from the headlights of a passing car. There were just enough of these latter
scenes to keep me reading to the end. I am not sorry I finished it but am unlikely
to read more by the same author.
My
tepid reaction to An American Childhood doesn’t match the back cover
blurb from The Chicago Tribune, which states: “An American Childhood
more than takes the reader’s breath away. It consumes you as you consume it, so
that when you have put down this book, you’re a different person, one who has
virtually experienced another childhood.” And I wouldn’t have guessed that it
was a Pulitzer Prize winner.
My
favorite of the three memoirs is Wild by Cheryl Strayed. The book’s
subtitle is “From Lost to Found on the Pacific Crest Trail,” and it tells the
story of her three-month-plus hike along the rugged trail. As she takes us with
her, she weaves in the events that lead her to the mostly solitary journey and
the lessons she learned from it. Like The Liars’ Club, Strayed begins—in
the Prologue—with a story she doesn’t finish until later, but this time we know
what happened and it is only the consequences that are left hanging. That
difference made the incident intriguing rather than frustrating.
If
you are expecting a hiking manual or a pure wilderness adventure, you won’t get
that from Wild, but as a memoir it resonated with me. The Wall Street
Journal called it “vivid, touching, and ultimately inspiring,” and this
time I can understand why it was voted a best book of the year by NPR, The
Boston Globe, Entertainment Weekly, and Vogue.
One
word of caution for some of my Christian friends: there is some profanity in Wild,
although it is far less obtrusive than in The Liars’ Club. There are
also references to sex and drugs, but those experiences are necessary to show
who Strayed was at the time, and the story would be incomplete without them.
As
I noted at the beginning of this post, you may not feel the way I do about one
or more of these books, and that’s okay. In Wild, Strayed mentions that
James Michener was her mother’s favorite author and Strayed liked him too while
she was growing up. Then a college professor called Michener an entertainer for
the masses and not worthy reading for a serious writer. Strayed passed that
opinion on to her mother at the time but regretted her arrogance after her
mother’s death.
Every
reader is different. Trust your own taste, and don’t let anyone make you feel
inferior because yours differs from theirs.
No comments:
Post a Comment