The
picture demonstrates how clutter can hurt a photo. What is the subject of the
picture? The shells? The seaweed? The texture of the rock? Or the spot of
orange that draws your eye to the left side of the photo? I don’t even know,
and I took it.
Writing works the same way, although
this post is going to focus on a specific type of clutter, which I can filler.
I usually have several projects going
at once, all in different stages. After the first draft, I set a manuscript
aside for a month or more so that I can come back to it with a fresh eye. I do,
however, make notes on possible changes and may even set myself a particular
goal for that second draft (besides improving the story, which is always the
primary goal).
I’m getting ready to do the second
draft of Almost Home, which is a story about the sinking of the Andrea
Doria. It’s too short for my audience, so my goal is to make it longer. Unfortunately,
that isn’t as easy as some people might think. The challenge is to avoid additions
that are mere filler.
Every scene in every novel should
have a purpose, and adding length doesn’t qualify. A scene that doesn’t move
the story along should develop a character or the setting. That’s also true of every
word, phrase, and paragraph. Everything else is merely filler that will
distract people from the story and maybe even obscure it the way the clutter
does in the photograph at the top of this post.
In revising Almost Home, I
could be tempted to expand the conversation during the first meal at sea. For
example, the strangers who share the table with Becky and her family might give
intimate details of their lives. Only a few of those details have anything to
do with the story or are necessary to develop the characters, however, and those
are already in the first draft. The other details are just filler. I can’t even
let my shy protagonist tell about the events in her early life that will become
important as the story progresses. That would be a boring info dump, Nobody
likes an info dump and, even worse, it would actually be inconsistent with Becky’s
character.
Or, since my protagonist gets
separated from her family shortly after the accident, maybe I could tell about
their different experiences. That would be fine if I used several points of
view, but my gut tells me to concentrate on my main character.
Instead, I’ll try to further develop Becky’s
experiences after the collision .
But it will still be a challenge to
avoid filler.
2 comments:
I don't know exactly how you're developing this book, but maybe adding length with historical background like in The Devil in the the White City or with explanation of how things function like in The Perfect Storm?
Thanks for the suggestions.
Post a Comment